Retrofit Atlas

Malls · California

Santa Monica Place

Imported, unreviewedOperatingSanta Monica, CA

Santa Monica Place remains open but faces a $300 million CMBS loan default, leaving its future ownership and use uncertain today. · summary, model-written

Ask who owns this Download dossier (PDF) · early access Download record (JSON) API Share LinkedIn Correct this record

Solid = from the authors' map · outlined = public source · dashed = model-written, not yet reviewed by a person. Tap any value's source label to see where it came from.

Map view. No verified photo yet. Send one.

Site profile5 elements · what this retrofit is built with · tap a chip for the evidence

Finance and pipeline
Default or watchlistThis site: research-deals · all sites with this
Recorded loanThis site: 300000000.0 CMBS trust research-deals · all sites with this
Place
County permitting 2,000+ apartment units a yearThis site: 9,430 units, Los Angeles County census-bps · all sites with this
County typical rent $2,000+This site: $2,806/mo zillow · all sites with this
Shrinking countyThis site: -2.5% census-acs · all sites with this

All elements and lists · Trends

Now

StatusOperatingpublic reporting

Deals and debt

DateEventPricePartiesSource
2024-04Loan · default— ← Macerich · lender CMBS trust · loan $300.0MCommercial Observer 2024-04

Securitised debt and public filers

Filings (2001 to date) that name “Santa Monica Place” and “Santa Monica” (316 hits, first 100 sampled, 4 other filers such as tenants left out). Common name: these matches are unreliable. No commercial-mortgage trust names this mall in the sample, which does not rule out a securitised loan. Text matches, not a title search. Open the search · all trusts.

KindFilerFilingsDatesForms
Public owner (strong)MACERICH CO (MAC)872001-03-29 to 2026-08-058-K 66, 10-Q 11, 10-K 10
Public owner (weak)Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB, PEB-PE, PEB-PF, PEB-PG, PEB-PH)22010-11-22 to 2010-11-228-K 2
Public owner (weak)LaSalle Hotel Properties22011-03-18 to 2012-07-188-K 2

As reported by the owner

Property tables from the owner's annual report (Form 10-K, Item 2) on EDGAR, one row per filing year. GLA, occupancy and anchors are the filer's own figures at that year end; “leased” counts signed leases, “occupied” counts open stores; ownership is the filer's share. Matched by name and place, unreviewed; the verbatim table row is in sec_facts.csv.

Year endFilerName in filingGLA sq ftOccupancyYearsShareSales psfAnchors listed
2025Macerich 10-K, 2026-02-20Santa Monica Place Santa Monica, CA
match: exact
357,000
in-line 357,000
71.2% leasedbuilt 1980 / acquired 1999100.0%
2016Macerich 10-K, 2017-02-24Santa Monica Place Santa Monica, CA
match: exact
517,000
in-line 294,000
86.5% leasedbuilt 1980 / acquired 1999 / renovated 2015100.0%Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom
2009Macerich 10-K, 2010-02-26Santa Monica Place Santa Monica, CA
match: exact
524,000
in-line 300,000
10.0% leasedbuilt 1980 / acquired 1999100.0%Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom

Site context

Housing permits, Los Angeles County (CA), 20249,430 units in 5+ unit buildings, 1,273 in 2–4, 9,106 single-family; 2023: 13,214 in 5+Census BPS
Other atlas sites nearby2 within 10 km, 28 within 25 km: Pickle Pop (0.7 km); Westside Pavilion (5.7 km)computed
Retail trade in the county, 2012 to 202328,998 establishments (+2%); 419,890 jobs (+8%)Census CBP
Housing market in the countytypical home value $871,674 (+0% 1 yr, +13% 5 yr); typical rent $2,806/mo (+1% 1 yr), 2026-09Zillow Research
Traffic on the busiest road within 600 m (2024)18,961 vehicles a day (minor arterial, 2 lanes); 35 counted segmentsFHWA HPMS

Summary, model-written

Santa Monica Place opened as a mall and remains operating, but in April 2024 its owner Macerich defaulted on a $300 million CMBS loan, putting the asset under distress.

Why. The record cites a distressed loan or foreclosure as the reason for the opportunity score, indicating the loan default is the primary stressor.

Where it stands. The mall is currently operating, with Macerich as the recorded owner while the loan is in default to a CMBS trust lender.

For a planner

  • No explicit planning precedents or policy tools are recorded.
  • Open questions include the outcome of the loan default process and any potential reuse or redevelopment plans.

For a developer

  • Site size and parcel boundaries are not provided in the record.
  • Control is split between owner Macerich and the lender due to loan default.
  • Entitlement stage and any zoning approvals are unknown.
  • Context‑layer constraints (flood, transit, environment) and market signals from tract data are not recorded.

What we do not know yet

  • Opening date, original anchor tenants, and current occupancy are unknown.
  • Exact site dimensions and parcel layout are missing.
  • Detailed loan terms beyond amount and default status are not provided.
  • Environmental, flood, and transit constraints from context layers are absent.
  • Tract‑level market data and verification status (draft) introduce uncertainty.

Generated by nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b on NVIDIA API via Hermes CT from the fields, parcels, deals and context layers on this page, with no outside knowledge. It is regenerated when the record changes and has not been checked by a person. How it is made.

Elsewhere on the web

Pages with photos

Search images: Google · Bing · Commons · references: ULI case studies · Google Scholar

Multifamily screen

  • county shrank -2.5% 2018–23
  • median rent $1,893
  • distressed loan or foreclosure

Inputs: record fields (size, status) and county Census ACS 2018–2023 figures (growth, rent). How the points work. Not a recommendation.

History and original facts

CountyLos Angeles County
Census division9 · Pacific
NotesRecord created from a 2024+ transaction, listing or loan report; no retrofit recorded.

Not yet recorded: acres, GLA, year opened, original developer, what is there now, retrofit year. Know it? Tell us.

Sources

More in California